
Hello. Good, everyone. Welcome to Washington Gun Law tv. I am Washington Gun Law President William Kirk. Thanks for joining us. Coming to you from Washington's premier indoor shooting facility. Of course, that's Security Gun Club, right here in Woodville, Washington. Hey, America, big update on the assault weapon ban case, the one coming out of Maryland. That's right. Snoop v Brown. The case that we have been talking about over and over and over. The state of Maryland finally got off. Its lazy. You know what got their reply brief in, and now we understand that the Supreme Court is ready to take action. So today, let's spend a few minutes and let's talk about major development in the assault weapon ban case.
Okay. Before we get going too far down the road, we're going down. Let's remember that this video is being brought to us by the Sonoran Desert Institute. That's right. Get ready to launch your career in the firearm industry today. Start arming yourself with education today, and most importantly, start defending the inalienable rights of millions of Americans nationwide all through the act of education. Listen to good folks at Sonoran Desert Institute. Have a degree and or certificate or just about anything else you need to get your career launched. So for more information, check 'em out in the description box below. Or better yet, just go ahead and visit 'em at sdi.edu. Okay, America, for the hundred 38th time, we're going to talk about the case of Snoop v. Brown. This is a challenge to Maryland's assault weapon ban case. It is sitting, as you know, on petition to the United States Supreme Court.
And after multiple delays, the state of Maryland finally got its response brief in the case is now being sent to conference December 13th. That means there will be a conference, and if four justices believe that the case should be accepted for review, Snoop v. Brown will be scheduled for arguments before the United States Supreme Court. We could have that decision before Christmas. So everyone, keep your fingers crossed. Everyone needs to be a good boy and good girl right now. And you know what to ask Santa for Christmas this year. Now, we have covered this case backwards and forwards, top to bottom, everybody knows what's at stake. But in reality, despite the fact that we've gone through hundreds and hundreds of pages of briefing and we've taken a look at every possible angle that there is, the case is really this simple. Is that when we talk about the history necessary to justify a firearm ban, the good news for every court is that historical analysis has already been done.
It was done in a multitude of cases, and it can really be summed up like this. You can't ban firearms which are in common use for lawful purposes, okay? Or put in other words, if a firearm or platform a firearm is in common use, it cannot be banned. The only history that we have ever established for banning platforms of firearms or weapons in general is weapons, which have been deemed both dangerous and unusual. So no court, no court has to go out and do a deep, deep historical dive into the history of firearms regulations when we're talking about the banning of platforms or specific weapons. Okay? It's been done for us before. So if that's the test, then what we know is, is that we're talking about the semi-automatic rifle, the modern sporting rifle, the most common long gun in circulation today. The most commonly purchased long gun by a long shot by the American consumer.
A firearm that even one Supreme Court Justice, justice Soda Mayor Order has referred to as one of the most commonly available and owned weapons in America, a firearm, which the A TF acknowledges is the most commonly owned a long gun in America. So really, there's not a deep dive that needs to be taken to be candid. The snow opinion, if it wanted to deal only with the limited issue of banning that particular platform of firearm is an opinion that could be written in five pages. But I want you to understand that the stakes on this particular case have never been greater because whatever ruling we could establish from Snow is going to be the catalyst upon which many other bands, including magazine bands, would all begin to crumble. So for all of the important cases that we've had an opportunity to cover here on Washington Gun Law, for all the important cases that we've had an opportunity to geek out here about on Washington gun law, snow v Brown arguably will be one of the most, if not the most important case to ever be decided by the United States Supreme Court when it comes to your inalienable Second Amendment, right?
Okay. Conferences scheduled once again for December 13th. Obviously, the minute we know if we get a thumbs up, that would be good news. That means we're going to the Supreme Court. Thumbs down is bad news. We'll probably throw ourselves off a bridge at that point, but we will do a video one way or the other to let you know. In the meantime, if you guys got any questions about this or anything else related to what's left of our Second Amendment rights, you guys should know how to get ahold of Washington Gun Law by now. But if you don't, that's okay. That information is down there in the description box. If you got an idea for a video we should be doing around here, you just click on that link right there and you let us know if you want to subscribe to our monthly newsletter. The ability to do all of that is right down there in the description box. And then finally, and most importantly, let's everyone remember that part of being the lawful and responsible gun on Earth, like we talk about all the time here, is to know what the law is in every situation and how it applies to you in any instance that you may find yourself. Until next time, thanks for watching. Stay Safe.
Credit: William Kirk, Esq., Washington Gun Law